3 years after Hamas’s October 7 attack, Israel is still combating a war it was never ever gotten ready for, one in which the weapons are not rockets or tanks however headings, social networks posts, and the stories that form how the world sees the Jewish state.
For Gil Hoffman, an experienced political expert who has actually invested much of his profession taking a look at how Israel is depicted abroad, this fight is not merely a public relations problem, however a tactical danger that the nation’s management has actually consistently stopped working to acknowledge.
Hoffman covered politics for The Jerusalem Post for almost a quarter century, before taking control of as executive director and managing editor of HonestReporting to “lead the defend Israel on the media battleground.”
He consulted with the Post today in the wake of the publication of his brand-new book, The Blood Libel Machinewhich argues that the spread of anti-Israel stories and the rise in worldwide antisemitism were not just spontaneous actions to the war, however the outcome of a premeditated details project that had actually remained in the works for years.
On October 7, 2023, that media battleground handled a brand-new seriousness. As Hamas terrorists crossed into southern Israel, the images and accounts of the massacre spread rapidly all over the world.
(credit: JEENAH MOON/REUTERS)
Israel stopped working on a significant front: The media landscape
Hoffman saw that Israel had actually been captured off guard in 2 unique however interconnected arenas. In his book, he explains October 7 as not just a military and intelligence failure, however likewise a failure on the media front.
3 years on, he stated, Israel still essentially misinterprets how to interact with the world.
Israel’s failure to get ready for the media battleground
“Hamas prepared this war in order to affect popular opinion all over the world,” he stated. “Their objective was not Nova, which they did not understand about; it was New York, and Israel played into their hands. They desired Israel to react with what they might call out of proportion force, no matter what it would be, and return the Palestinian problem to the global program.”
Israel not having an intend on this front, similar to it didn’t have an intend on the military front, has actually hurt the Jewish state “enormously,” Hoffman included.
“Every day considering that October 7 has actually ended up being easier on the military battleground. Every day given that October 7 has actually gotten gradually harder on the media one.”
The contrast is main to his book. Israel has actually dedicated massive resources to its military expertise, however Hoffman argues that succeeding federal governments have actually dealt with public diplomacy as a secondary issue, regardless of its prospective impact on both domestic security and the security of Jewish neighborhoods abroad.
According to Hoffman, the issue starts at the greatest levels of federal government.
“They did not recognize they require to be taking into consideration how the choice they’re about to make in Gaza, in Iran, versus Hezbollah, how these choices are going to affect the Jews in Golders Green and in New York. They did not take it into account whatsoever.”
Another tactical failure Hoffman determined is Israel’s propensity to stay on the protective instead of challenge the reliability and inspirations of those forming the worldwide story.
Much of Israel’s media technique, if there is one, has actually concentrated on rebutting false information, contesting truths and figures, and explaining defects in reasoning.
Hoffman stated Israel requires to be far more on the offensive.
In his book, he sets out 4 needed techniques he thinks need to interact: offending and protective messaging, both within the context of the dispute and beyond it.
“I count 4. It makes a Venn diagram that works completely. If you’re losing out on any of the 4, then it’s insufficient. Yes, we require to be blackening the names of the individuals battling versus us.”
Israel needs to be “getaway” worldwide anti-Israel figures who are accepting substantial quantities of cash from Qatar, Hoffman argued.
“We require to be outing that. It’s not genuine, the manner in which Qatar is affecting the world. Al Jazeera is not a genuine wire service. It’s a propaganda mouth piece of a terrorist-supporting state. Individuals require to understand that. Individuals require to understand what they can and they can’t rely on.”
Qatar inhabits a popular location in Hoffman’s analysis. The Gulf state, which has actually hosted Hamas politicians and played a main function in settlements including Israel and Hamas, funds Al Jazeera, among the most prominent Arabic-language news networks on the planet. Hoffman argues that Qatar’s monetary and media affect warrants higher examination.
The offending method likewise requires to be utilized more on college schools, where, for a long time, the pro-Israel groups have actually been attempting to be “great,” and Hoffman states they “require to be less great since the anti-Israel companies on their school are not good.”
He thinks pro-Israel trainees and companies require to be more assertive in challenging anti-Israel advocacy instead of relying mostly on discussion and tries to encourage those currently highly opposed to Israel.
This likewise links to Qatar, offered the substantial reporting showing considerable scholastic institutional ties in between the Gulf state and United States universities.
How worldwide organizations form the narrative
Among the most tough elements of this media battle is combating the dominant story distributed by human rights bodies and NGOs, Hoffman stated.
The United Nations, Oxfam, Amnesty International, Doctors Without Borders, and others have actually contributed in legitimizing the anti-Israel rhetoric utilized in public and personal areas. Due to the fact that of these companies, buzzwords such as “genocide,” “apartheid,” and “ethnic cleaning” have actually ended up being stabilized in daily discourse and in global media outlets.
Hoffman stated he wished to speak with reporters who covered the dispute throughout the war and “provide the advantage of the doubt.” He stated he asked why they thought Hamas.
“They stated, ‘No, we didn’t think anything from Hamas. Our company believe the companies.’ And they thought Hamas.
“These companies were the ones who spread out the propaganda and sterilized what a terrorist company informed them. The media price quote these trustworthy companies around the world, and it ends up being a vicious circle. As Gerald Steinberg, the creator of NGO Monitor, comprehended method back at the Durban, this was going to trigger damage to Israel, and now the whole world requires to comprehend that.”
The Durban recommendation is considerable. At the 2001 UN World Conference Against Racism in South Africa, an accompanying NGO online forum ended up being the focus of debate over antisemitism and the representation of Israel. Its statement explained Israel as an apartheid state and implicated it of genocide and ethnic cleaning, language that would end up being significantly popular in subsequent projects versus the Jewish state.
In Hoffman’s view, the occasions surrounding Durban were not a separated episode however an early sign of how human rights terms might be utilized as part of a wider project to delegitimize Israel.
“So, that’s part of that blood libel maker, the method which– wittingly or unknowingly, and, sadly, frequently wittingly– these NGOs belonged to it. The blood libel maker is the media. It is Qatar. It is Hamas. It is the anti-Israel companies worldwide.”
Combating back versus the device
Battling this is an uphill struggle, partially due to the fact that these companies are seen globally as the beacons of justice and apotheosis of morality. It is challenging to persuade doubters that their findings and public declarations ought to go through the very same examination as those of federal governments and other celebrations.
“It’s tough, however we require to be continuously putting out truths,” Hoffman continued. “We understand the number of lots of help we’re offering to Gaza. We understand what whatever Israel did unprecedentedly to assist an opponent contender in the time of war. We understand just how much effort Israel made to reduce civilian casualties. Bit by bit, we can sculpt away at this incorrect story that has actually been raised upon the world.”
Hoffman’s decision to stay positive is a repeating style throughout both the book and the interview, even as he explains the scale of the difficulty dealing with Israel.
“I didn’t wish to compose a book of gloom and doom. I wished to compose a book that would offer individuals hope.
“That’s why the subtitle of the book is Exposing the anti-Israel Hate Network, and How to eliminate Back. I provide individuals 30 various tools they can utilize, whether it’s in traditional media, social networks, or AI platforms.”
Instead of leaving readers with a medical diagnosis of the issue, Hoffman commits a considerable part of the book to useful action. He does not think it is far too late for Israel to turn the tide.
“It’s not far too late. Every day, every individual on social networks and even individuals who aren’t on social networks, in the checkout line of the supermarket, everyone can make an effect.
“I do not see it as this mountain that’s overwhelming. I think in commemorating incremental success. And we, every day, can alter minds. Not of the most severe individuals, however of the frustrating bulk.”
One method he recommends individuals act is by engaging more seriously with global media and holding them liable when they discover inaccurate or prejudiced reporting.
“People frequently ask me, should I cancel my membership to The New York Times and other media outlets for being anti-Israel?
“I state never. You require to be reading it. If you wish to harm them, then read them more thoroughly. If you see something troublesome, send it to the media guard dogs like HonestReporting or to reporters themselves, or send it to their regional media and mention that their competitor had actually made a mistake. Which’s all part of restoring deterrence on the media battleground.”
This method is formed by his years in journalism and media tracking. Instead of disengage from outlets they suspect, Hoffman argues, readers ought to end up being more notified, mindful customers of their reporting.
He pointed out an example of when, throughout protection of the release of the last 20 living captives in October 2025, CNN press reporter Christiane Amanpour declared that Israeli captives were dealt with “much better than the typical Gazan” since Hamas utilized them as bargaining chips.
Somebody flagged the remark, and Hoffman himself then got in touch with Foreign Minister Gideon Sa’ar, who called CNN and asked for that she be held liable.
Amanpour consequently said sorry, calling her remarks insensitive and incorrect.
“That originated from common individuals who were viewing and ensured that we would recognize this. Therefore individuals can have that function when they see things that are outright.”
Social network likewise has the innovation for users to seriously engage. Users on X/Twitter can include neighborhood notes on posts that are improperly provided or are missing out on essential details.
Seeking to Israel’s next federal government
While Hoffman does think duty can rest with private news customers, his criticism eventually goes back to Israel’s political management and its failure to deal with public diplomacy as a necessary component of nationwide security.
While people might assist challenge deceptive stories, just the federal government has the authority and tools to develop a collaborated, long-lasting interactions technique, one that expects the global effects of its actions instead of reacting after the damage has actually been done.
“They require to be taking this simply as seriously as the nuclear danger from Iran, since it’s an existential risk to the future of the State of Israel and the Jewish individuals worldwide.
“And they require to be appreciating the method every choice they make is viewed abroad.”
With Israel’s October 27 elections approaching, the concern is whether a brand-new federal government, no matter its political makeup, will be prepared to buy the media battleground as seriously as it purchases traditional security.
“It does not matter who wins the election. They all require to make certain the next federal government designates simply as much, if not more, moneying to media technique and public diplomacy. They require to have individuals all set 24/7 to go on the media and discuss what’s going on here, in every language possible.
“The embassies and consulates abroad are terribly underfunded. Which requires to be altered, since those are individuals who are constructing the relationships with individuals there on the ground and with the media.”
Hoffman makes the case that the battle over Israel’s worldwide track record will not end when the battling on the ground does. It will continue in newsrooms, universities, online platforms, and in daily interaction.
And while federal governments bear the most obligation for preparing Israel to challenge that difficulty, Hoffman’s definite message is that the battleground is no longer theirs alone. Its result will likewise depend upon whether those enjoying from the sidelines want to act.
Discover more from PMN S.P.O.R.T.S - A PRIME MEDIA NETWORK BRAND
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
