Former Governor Rochas Okorocha of Imo State has actually implicated Governor Hope Uzodimma of depending on files consisting of supposed abnormalities to declare triumph in the All Progressives Congress (APC) senatorial main for Imo West, firmly insisting that he stays the dominant political force in the celebration in the state.
Mr Okorocha made the claims throughout an interview onEmerge NewsPrime-time Television on Thursday, a day after the Federal High Court in Abuja stated him the winner of the contested APC main and bought the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) to identify him as the celebration’s prospect for the 2027 senatorial election.
The previous guv likewise challenged the authenticity of the APC management structure in Imo State, dismissing those presumably mobilised versus him as political partners of Mr Uzodimma instead of agents of effectively chosen celebration structures.
“Rochas is the APC in Imo State. I was a founding dad of this celebration,” he stated. “The structure of APC in Imo State is Rochas. And I provided the name APC.”
The remarks indicate a restored fight in between the 2 political leaders, whose competition has actually formed the APC’s internal politics in Imo.
PREMIUM TIMES reported on Thursday that Justice Obiora Egwuatu of the Federal High Court bought Mr Uzodimma to stop providing himself as the APC’s prospect for Imo West Senatorial District.

The court likewise directed the APC to forward Mr Okorocha’s name to INEC for publication as its prospect for the election set up for 16 January 2027.
The judgement followed a fit submitted by Mr Okorocha challenging INEC’s acknowledgment of Mr Uzodimma as the winner of the celebration’s 18 May main.
Accusations over main files
Throughout Thursday’s interview, Mr Okorocha used his account of the documentary proof that formed the basis of his legal difficulty, declaring that the records provided in assistance of Mr Uzodimma’s development as the APC senatorial prospect included some disparities.
He stated he got licensed copies of files connecting to the main from INEC on 26 July 2026, after making the required application and payments.
According to him, the files consequently trust by Mr Uzodimma existed to the electoral commission on 22 August, nearly a month after he had actually gotten his own licensed copies.
Mr Okorocha questioned the situations surrounding the introduction of the later files, explaining them as an afterthought.
He likewise declared that there were disparities in the dates tape-recorded for the main election.
He stated files supporting Mr Uzodimma’s development suggested that the election was carried out on 16 May, whereas the real workout occurred on 18 May.
Another disparity, according to him, worried the description of Mr Uzodimma’s development as an agreement plan in spite of the presence of contending candidates and taped votes.
Mr Okorocha stated the guv might not have actually emerged through agreement when he himself took part in the contest and was credited with votes.
He even more declared that result sheets covering more than 300 ballot systems throughout 144 wards and 12 city government locations were finished in the handwriting of a single person.
He likewise declared that some ward result sheets consisted of no entries, although files consequently provided at the city government level consisted of collected outcomes.
Mr Okorocha contrasted these files with the records he stated he got from INEC, firmly insisting that his own corresponded in their discussion and accreditation.
He recommended that the inconsistencies raised concerns about the credibility of the files utilized to support Mr Uzodimma’s election.
“All the false information on social networks about my files have actually been laid to rest since the court has actually discovered that the files are authentic and proper,” he stated.
Conflict over INEC’s function
Mr Okorocha likewise challenged the tip that INEC had separately identified the result of the APC main in Mr Uzodimma’s favour.
He argued that the commission’s duty throughout celebration primaries was mainly to keep an eye on the workout and keep records of the result sent by the political celebration.
He declared that although the outcomes kept an eye on by INEC favoured him, the figures ultimately revealed were various from those transferred to the commission’s head office.
He stated the celebration had, at some time, directed that the outcomes must not be revealed at the state level however required to its nationwide secretariat for statement.
Mr Okorocha stated that this produced the inconsistency in between the outcomes he declared were taped throughout the workout and the result ultimately revealed by the celebration.
He likewise questioned the origin of a letter presumably sent to the APC nationwide chairman by the Imo Resident Electoral Commissioner (REC), declaring that it was accredited by the celebration instead of INEC.
According to him, the letter was anticipated to bear the signatures of both the REC and the Head of Election Monitoring, however just the REC signed it.
He stated the file supporting his own claim was resolved to the APC nationwide chairman and accredited by INEC.
Mr Okorocha kept that these distinctions became part of the proof he provided to challenge the guv’s election.
On difficulty to his match
Reacting to concerns about why he did not institute his legal action within 14 days of the main, Mr Okorocha stated he might not have actually challenged an outcome he thought had actually currently been formally taped in his favour.
He stated he just ended up being mindful of the issue on 1 September, when he found that his name had actually been displaced from the records regardless of having actually acquired qualified copies of the pertinent files from INEC.
He discussed that he had no factor to set up procedures versus himself when the files in his ownership revealed that he had actually won the main.
He consequently took legal action against INEC, signing up with the APC and Mr Uzodimma as participants.
The guv and the APC had actually challenged the match on the premises that it was submitted outside the 14-day duration recommended for pre-election matters.
In their actions before the court, they contested Mr Okorocha’s account of the main.
An agent of the guv’s election committee had actually informed the court that Mr Uzodimma won the workout with 230,464 votes versus Mr Okorocha’s 1,098 votes.
INEC likewise preserved in its counter-affidavit that its authorities kept track of the election and reported Mr Uzodimma as the winner.
Mr Okorocha stated he was positive that the truths supporting his case were strong enough to endure additional judicial evaluation, although he acknowledged that the opposing celebrations kept the right to appeal.
He stated he did not anticipate Mr Uzodimma to challenge the judgement, worrying that the proof before the court was engaging.
Imo APC management disagreement
Beyond the senatorial election, Mr Okorocha utilized the interview to challenge the political authority of those declaring control of the APC in Imo State.
He dismissed ideas that prominent celebration figures were mobilising versus him, explaining them as people selected by Mr Uzodimma instead of leaders who emerged through acknowledged celebration congresses.
“There are no forces, these are what I call the PAs of Hope, that he might create and state, take chairman,” he stated.
He questioned whether the celebration had actually carried out congresses to develop the authenticity of the structures existing as opposition to him.
“Has there been any election? Existed any congress carried out? There was none,” he stated.
Mr Okorocha likewise questioned the participation of the Imo State Government in the legal disagreement, describing that the contest was in between him and Mr Uzodimma as people instead of in between 2 federal governments.
“What does Imo State Government pertain to the election in between me and Hope Uzodimma as an individual? It’s not Imo State Government objecting to for election, it’s Hope Uzodimma,” he stated.
He kept that his political relationship with individuals of Imo State would allow him to mobilise assistance for the APC and President Bola Tinubu ahead of the 2027 elections.
Uzodimma’s camp turns down judgement
The guv’s camp and the APC have actually turned down the judgement.
The Imo State Commissioner for Information, Declan Emelumba, explained the choice as a travesty of justice and stated the state federal government would approach the Court of Appeal to challenge it.
Mr Emelumba likewise argued that the judgement overlooked judicial precedents on the time limitation for setting up pre-election cases and the treatment for providing accusations of forgery.
The APC in Imo State kept that Mr Uzodimma stayed its genuine prospect for the senatorial district, firmly insisting that he won the celebration’s main.
The celebration stated its legal department would study the judgement and pursue readily available legal solutions.
The APC representative, Jones Onwuasoanya, stated the APC would identify its next strategy after examining the court’s choice.
READ ALSO: APC responds to court judgement sacking Uzodimma as senatorial prospect
PREMIUM TIMES gotten in touch with Oguike Nwachuku, the guv’s Chief Press Secretary, for Mr Uzodimma’s reaction to Mr Okorocha’s claims worrying the main files, the celebration’s management structure and the possibility of an appeal.
Mr Nwachuku informed our press reporter he would react to the accusation. He had yet to do so as of the time of filing this report.
The conflict is the current chapter in the longstanding political competition in between the 2 males. Mr Okorocha governed Imo from 2011 to 2019 before ending up being the senator for Imo West in between 2019 and 2023.
Mr Uzodimma, who ended up being guv in January 2020 following a Supreme Court judgement that reversed the outcome of the 2019 governorship election, is serving his 2nd and last term, which ends in January 2028.
Discover more from Premium Times Nigeria
Sign up for get the most recent posts sent out to your e-mail.
Discover more from PMN S.P.O.R.T.S - A PRIME MEDIA NETWORK BRAND
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.





